No Durban mandate for the great escape

> Dear friends
>
> Many of you may be aware that the climate talks here in Durban have become dominated by talk of a new ‘mandate’. Much of African civil society, social movements and other climate justice groups are extremely concerned that the push for a new ‘mandate’ is an excuse for inaction by rich developed countries. With much of the media narrative also framed around this new push, many civil society groups have joined in the chorus for a new mandate. It is important that governments, the media and those groups who have been seduced by this narrative realise that there are many groups who believe that Durban needs to focus on a legally binding Kyoto Protocol, ambitious targets in line with the science, the closing of loopholes and progress on the Green Climate Fund including adequate public finance. >
> The letter below has been drafted and is being circulated and will be handed into the various Govt delegations – and in particular the European Union who have been at the forefront of this push for a new mandate. >
> If you wish to add your organisations name please send an email to greeder@coa.edu >
> We need your signatures by 5.00pm (Durban time) on Thursday 8th December. >
> Please circulate to your lists
>
> warm regards from Durban
> ________________________________
> From: Bobby Peek [bobby@groundwork.org.za]
> Sent: 07 December 2011 09:40
>
> Subject: No Durban mandate for the great escape
>
>
>
> No Durban mandate for the great escape
>
> As African civil society, social movements and international allies, we reject the call of many developed countries for a so-called “Durban mandate” to launch new negotiations for a future climate framework. >
> A new mandate for a new treaty in place of the Kyoto Protocol should be understood for what it really is – rich countries backtracking and reneging on “inconvenient” obligations, at the expense of the poor and the planet. While developed countries may appear progressive by asking for a mandate to negotiate a new legally binding treaty, the truth is that this is nothing but a veiled attempt to kill the Kyoto Protocol and escape from their further mitigation obligations under the already existing mandate in the Protocol itself, and the agreement in 2005 for negotiating further emission cuts. A political declaration to continue the KP is, in practice, another nail in its coffin. Anything less than a formal legal amendment and ratification process, will deliver an empty shell of the Kyoto Protocol. >
> Agreeing to a new mandate would mean action is effectively delayed for five to ten years. A new treaty will take several years to negotiate with several more years needed for ratification. Further, there is no assurance that countries that have repudiated the existing legal architecture, like the United States, will agree to or ratify a new agreement, nor that such agreement will not be a weak and ineffective “pledge and review” system. >
> Developed countries must urgently scale up the ambition of their emission reduction targets. As the latest reports by the International Energy Agency make clear, deep emission cuts are needed now to have a realistic chance of limiting temperature rise to 1.5•C. Current emission reduction pledges will lead us to a world that is 5•C warmer. For Africa, this means 7 or 8•C of warming and unimaginable human suffering. This is why a pledge-based approach with weak review rules, instead of the Kyoto Protocol’s approach of legally binding commitments and international rules that give meaning to these commitments, is completely insufficient to ensure the necessary emission cuts. >
> While many developed countries condition any further action, including fulfilling their legally binding obligations to a second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, on greater action by emerging economies, developing country pledges already far outweigh pledges by developed countries. In fact, with accounting loopholes and the use of carbon markets, developed countries could make no net contribution to reducing emissions by 2020. >
> While many developed countries seek to end the Kyoto Protocol, they simultaneously attempt to retain and expand their favored elements of the Kyoto Protocol, like the CDM, in a new agreement and shift their responsibilities onto developing countries. Without legally binding emission reductions under the Kyoto Protocol, developed countries must not be allowed to have access to the carbon markets. Further, with the price of carbon crashing, paltry emissions reductions pledges from developed countries, there is no rationale for the continuation of the CDM or the creation of new market mechanisms. >
> Developed countries must scale up their ambition and stop blaming other countries who have contributed far less to the climate crisis, yet are taking on more aggressive action. Developing countries are living up to their promises made in Bali, while developed countries are attempting to re-write the rules of the game to avoid meeting their obligations. >
> Developed countries are also denying developing countries the necessary finances and technology to address the climate crisis. The provision of finance from developed to developing countries is an obligation in and of itself. It must not be used as a bargaining chip in the Durban negotiations, nor should it be dangled in front of poor countries as a bribe to get agreement for a very bad mitigation deal. The same applies to the operationalization of the Green Climate Fund. Success in Durban depends on the Green Climate Fund not being an empty, ineffective shell. >
> We will not accept a “Durban mandate” or any outcome that locks in the current low ambition and inaction for many years, and condemns billions of people in Africa and across the world to suffer the worst impacts of a warming world. >
> Signed by:
>
> Africa Trade Network
> Alternative Information Development Centre
> Democratic Left Front
> Friends of the Earth International
> groundWork, Friends of the Earth, South Africa
> Jubilee South (Asia Pacific)
> Pan African Climate Justice Alliance
> Rural Women’s Alliance
> South Durban Community Environmental Alliance
> Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute
> Third World Network
> Trust for Community Outreach and Education
>
>
> Bobby Peek
> Director
> groundWork, Friends of the Earth, South Africa
>
> Direct E-mail: bobby@groundwork.org.za
> General E-mail: team@groundwork.org.za
> Skype: bobbysvenpeek
> Tel: +27-(0)-33 342 5662
> Fax: +27-(0)-33 342 5665
> Mobile: +27-(0)-82 464 1383
>
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CCB4D2.F30DEE10]
>

>

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s