EDF SUING CLIMATE ACTIVISTS FOR £5 MILLION – PROTESTERS FACE LOSING HOMES

Via: www.nodashforgas.org.uk

PRESS RELEASE: EDF SUING CLIMATE ACTIVISTS FOR £5 MILLION – PROTESTERS FACE LOSING HOMES

Posted Wed 20th Feb 2013, 7:50pm

• EDF suing climate activists for £5million

• Evidence of police/corporate collusion as police serve legal papers on
activists on behalf of EDF, and hand over personal data

• Key CCTV footage at police station may have been deleted

• Counter-Terrorism Command visited activist at home

• Home Secretary Theresa May questioned in Parliament

For more information, photos, film footage and interviews email
press@nodashforgas.org.uk or phone 07447027112. A new short film of two of
the activists speaking about the civil claim can be seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTZgMIn4Go

Following the week-long shut-down and occupation of EDF’s West Burton
gas-fired power station last October by campaign group ‘No Dash for Gas’,
EDF has launched a civil claim for damages against the group and
associated activists for costs the company claims to have incurred – a
figure it puts at £5 million [1].

Should the claim succeed, several of the campaigners face losing their
homes, and all could face bankruptcy or be forced to pay a percentage of
their salaries to EDF for decades to come. The amount of the claim
represents just 0.3% of EDF’s annual UK profits, which rose by 7.5% this
year to £1.7 billion [2].

This is the first time an energy company has attempted such a claim, and
campaigners say it represents the opening of a new front against peaceful
direct action protesters. If successful, it could have a chilling effect
on other groups – such as UK Uncut and Greenpeace – who use civil
disobedience to challenge social and environmental problems.

Aneaka Kelly, one of the No Dash for Gas defendants said: ‘This un-civil
action by EDF is not about money – they know we don’t have this kind of
cash. EDF just want to make sure that anyone who tries to stand up and
challenge their profiteering price hikes, shady government lobbying and
climate-trashing power plants is quickly silenced by the threat of legal
action.”

Sixteen campaigners occupied two chimneys at West Burton for a week in
October 2012, stopping nearly 20,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions [3]. The
activists – 21 in total – were convicted of aggravated trespass at
Mansfield Magistrates Court today. Seventeen are due to be sentenced on
March 20th, and the remaining four on April 2nd.

There is evidence that Nottinghamshire Police colluded with EDF against
‘No Dash for Gas’ by formally serving civil papers on the activists after
their arrest, and by sharing their personal data with the power company.
In one case officers served the papers on the activists’ lawyer, in
another they chased an activist down the street outside the station and
served the papers on him directly, commenting, “I’m doing this as a
courtesy to EDF” [4]. Last week, the Home Secretary was questioned in
Parliament about whether this kind of practice is routine [5].

The campaigners believe that Nottinghamshire Police’s support for the
civil claim is part of a larger strategy to crack down on environmental
protest, as evidenced by the use of extremely onerous bail conditions on
the activists after their arrest. They were not allowed to associate with
each other and most were subject to home curfews from 9pm to 7am. Those
conditions were only lifted once the company had ordered its own civil
legal strategy against the activists. FOI documents obtained by No Dash
for Gas show that a Special Advisor in the Department for Energy was
liaising with the police about those bail conditions before most of the
activists were even arrested. [6]

In another incident, Counter Terrorism Command officers visited an
activist at her home to ‘remind’ her of her bail conditions and caution
her against going within 50 metres of E.ON’s Grain Island Power Station.

Deeply concerned by police involvement in the unprecedented civil claim,
the activists’ lawyer Mike Schwarz of Bindmans wrote to the police asking
to view CCTV footage from inside the station, only to be told it had
probably been deleted as footage was only kept for three months – despite
the fact that this three-month deadline had not yet passed.

Aneaka Kelly from No Dash For Gas said: “The police are meant to be
working in the public interest, not acting as EDF’s private police force.
If I wanted to sue EDF over their pollution or their price hikes, would
you expect the police to deliver the legal papers to EDF on my behalf, or
hand over the names and addresses of their top executives? Somehow, I
don’t think so.”

The protest itself aimed to challenge the Government’s plan to build up to
40 new gas-fired power stations, which would see gas accounting for over
50% of the UK’s power generation over the next three decades. The
Government’s own Committee on Climate Change have said that a new “dash
for gas” would make it impossible for the Government to meet its
legally-binding carbon reduction targets, and thus would push us ever
closer to the brink of unstoppable climate change [7].

The Committee also point out that a greater reliance on gas would increase
household bills by up to six times more than a shift to renewable energy
[8]. These comments were echoed this week by the Chief Executive of Ofgem
Alistair Buchanan, who warned that an increased reliance on gas will lead
to higher prices in the near future [9]. Campaigners blame the lobbying
power of big energy companies like EDF for the Government’s current
pro-gas position [10].

The case is reminiscent of the record-breaking “McLibel” case, when the
fast food chain McDonalds sued two activists from North London from
1990-1997. Ewa Jasiewicz, another No Dash for Gas defendant said: ‘This is
starting to look just like McLibel. It’s a David and Goliath battle
between protesters with nothing but their bodies to put in the way, and
out-of-control Big Energy which has a business plan that will drive up
bills, push millions into fuel poverty and crash our climate targets. We
will be resisting EDF’s claim every step of the way’.

ENDS

Notes for editors

[1] Copies of the legal papers from EDF are available – please email us on
press@nodashforgas.org.uk or phone 07447027112 to see them. The £5 million
figure was presented in court today, in evidence from Graeme Bellingham,
Project Director at West Burton’s, who stated that: ‘Delays to the final
completion of the project has caused total losses to EDF in excess of £5
million’. See also
http://www.channel4.com/news/edf-sues-activists-for-5m-an-attack-on-peaceful-protest

[2]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/feb/14/edf-profits-rise-following-price-hike

[3] See
http://www.nodashforgas.org.uk/blog/press-release-campaigners-prevent-carbon-emissions-in-longest-ever-power-station-occupation.
The campaigners calculated that they were stopping 2,371 tonnes per day,
and the action lasted for seven days, so that’s 2371 x 7 = 19117 tonnes of
CO2 saved.

[4] See
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/feb/20/activists-police-edf-law-suit

[5] On Friday 8th February, Caroline Lucas (MP for Brighton Pavilion) put
forward the following question in Parliament:

“To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what her policy is
on (a) the provision of
information by the police to private companies that are planning or taking
civil legal action against protesters, where those protesters may be
subject to criminal proceedings, (b) the timing of the provision of such
information and (c) provision of other practical assistance by the police
to companies taking civil proceedings, including service or quasi-service
of court papers; whether her Department has established any formal
procedures or organisations to (i) facilitate the flow of any such
information and (ii) establish compliance with or breach of any such
procedures and policies; and if she will make a statement.”

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmordbk2/130212o01.htm#13_

The Home Secretary has not yet responded.

[6] FOI documents available on request – please email us on
press@nodashforgas.org.uk or phone 07447027112 to see them.

[7]
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/tories-dash-for-gas-risks-climate-target-8120153.html

[8]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/dec/13/gas-energy-bills-renewables

[9]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/9878281/Ofgem-boss-warns-of-higher-energy-prices-in-supply-roller-coaster.html

[10] See for example
http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/dirty_half_dozen.pdf

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Open letter to COP18 Delegates from Bill McKibben, Nnimmo Bassey & Pablo Soló n

Open letter:
To really address climate change UNFCCC-COP18 should decide to
leave under the soil more than 2/3 of the fossil reserves

2012 saw the shocking melt of the Arctic, leading our greatest climatologist to declare a ‘planetary emergency,’ and it saw weather patterns wreck harvests around the world, raising food prices by 40% and causing family emergencies in poor households throughout the world.

That’s what happens with 0.8ºC of global warming. If we are going to stop this situation from getting worse, an array of institutions have explained this year precisely what we need to do: leave most of the carbon we know about in the ground and stop looking for more.

If

we want a 50-50 chance of staying below two degrees, we have to leave 2/3 of the known reserves of coal and oil and gas underground; if we want an 80% chance, we have to leave 80% of those reserves untouched. That’s not “environmentalist math” or some radical interpretation–that’s from the report of the International Energy Agency last month.

It means that–without dramatic global action to change our path–the end of the climate story is already written. There is no room for doubt–absent remarkable action, these fossil fuels will burn, and the temperature will climb creating a chain reaction of climate related natural disasters.

Negotiators

should cease their face-saving, their endless bracketing and last minute cooking of texts and concentrate entirely on figuring out how to live within the carbon budget scientists set. We can’t emit more than 565 more gigatons of carbon before 2050, but at the current pace we’ll blow past that level in 15 years. If we want to have a chance to stick to this budget by 2020 we can’t send to the atmosphere more than 200 gigatons.

Rich

countries who have poured most of the carbon into the atmosphere (especially the planet’s sole superpower) need to take the lead in emission reductions and the emerging economies have also to make commitments to reduce the exploitation of oil, coal and gas. The right to development should be understood as the obligation of the states to guarantee the basic needs of the population to enjoy a fulfilled and happy life, and not as a free ticket for a consumer and extractivist society that doesn’t take into account the limits of the planet and the wellbeing of all humans.

There’s

no longer time for diplomatic delays. Most of the negotiators in the Eighteenth Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) know that these are the facts. Now is the time to act for the future of humanity and Nature.

Bill McKibben, Nnimmo Bassey & Pablo Solon

(Bill McKibben founder of 350.org, Nnimmo Bassey Environmental Rights Action & Coordinator of Oilwatch International, Pablo Solon Executive

Director of Focus on the Global South, former Bolivian Ambassador to the UN and former chief negotiator for climate change).

http://pablosolon.wordpress.com/
http://focusweb.org/content/really-address-climate-change-unfccc-cop18-should-decide-leave-under-soil-more-23-fossil

Carta abierta:
La XVIII Conferencia sobre Cambio Climático debe decidir
dejar bajo el suelo más de dos terceras partes de los combustibles fósiles

2012 vio el sorprendente derretimiento del Ártico que llevó a la declaratoria de “emergencia planetaria” por los mas importantes climatólogos. Así mismo, este año el cambio climático arruinó cosechas en todo el mundo, elevando los precios de alimentos en un 40% y causando emergencias familiares en los hogares pobres de todo el mundo.

Esto es lo que sucede con 0,8ºC de incremento en la temperatura. Una serie de instituciones han señalado lo que tenemos que hacer para evitar que esta situación se agrave: dejar la mayor parte de las reservas conocidas de combustibles fósiles bajo la tierra y dejar de buscar más.

Si queremos tener una probabilidad de 50% de permanecer por debajo de un incremento de 2ºC, tenemos que dejar 2/3 partes de las reservas conocidas de carbón, petróleo y gas bajo tierra. Si queremos un 80% de probabilidades, tenemos que dejar sin tocar el 80% de las reservas. Eso no es “matemáticas ambientalista” o alguna interpretación radical. Este es el informe de la Agencia Internacional de Energía del mes pasado.

Esto significa que -sin una acción mundial urgente para cambiar el curso de los acontecimientos- el final de la historia del clima ya está escrito. No hay lugar para la duda. Sí continua la inacción, estos combustibles fósiles se quemarán y la temperatura subirá creando una reacción en cadena de desastres natural producto del cambio climático.

Los negociadores deben dejar de tratar de salvar las apariencias -con sus encorchetados y textos fabricados a último momento- para concentrarse exclusivamente en encontrar la manera de vivir dentro de los límites que la ciencia ha establecido para el uso del presupuesto de carbono que nos queda. No podemos emitir más de 565 giga toneladas de dióxido de carbono hasta el 2050. Al ritmo actual vamos a quemar mas de esa cantidad en los próximos 15 años. Si queremos tener algún chance de no sobrepasar ese presupuesto de dióxido de carbono no podemos enviar a la atmósfera más de 200 giga toneladas hasta el año 2020.

Los países ricos que han enviado la mayor parte del carbono a la atmósfera (en particular la única superpotencia del planeta) deben reducir inmediatamente sus emisiones de carbono. También las economías emergentes tienen que asumir compromisos de reducción en la explotación de carbón, petróleo y gas. El derecho al desarrollo debe entenderse como la obligación de los Estados de garantizar las necesidades básicas de la población para disfrutar de una vida plena y feliz, y no como un boleto gratis para una sociedad consumista y extractivista que no toma en cuenta los límites del planeta y el bienestar de todos los seres humanos.

Ya no hay tiempo para dilaciones diplomáticas. La mayoría de los negociadores en la XVIII Conferencia de las Partes de la CMNUCC (Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático) saben que estos son los hechos. Ahora es el momento de actuar por el futuro de la humanidad y la naturaleza.

Bill McKibben, Nnimmo Bassey y Pablo Solón

(Bill McKibben fundador de 350.org, Nnimmo Bassey “Environmental Rights Action” Coordinador de Oilwatch Internacional, Pablo Solón Director Ejecutivo de “Focus on the Global South”, ex-embajador de Bolivia ante la ONU y ex-jefe negociador de cambio climático).

http://pablosolon.wordpress.com/
http://focusweb.org/content/really-address-climate-change-unfccc-cop18-should-decide-leave-under-soil-more-23-fossil

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SADC peoples summit – Maputo 13-16 aug

Announcing the 2012 SADC People’s Summit.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

This 11-year-old environmental activist is oil companies’ worst nightmare

Reblogged from Grist:

At Rio+20, Tai'Kaiya Blaney, 11, spoke -- mic-check style -- against a future where the land is filled with pipelines and oceans are empty of life:

Blaney's a member of the Sliammon Nation in Canada and has already built up an impressive record as an environmental activist. She's been fighting against tar-sands pipelines in Canada and has already been escorted off of pipeline company Enbridge's property, …

Read more… 89 more words, 1 more video

Powerful words. Not like the weak statements coming from our politicians
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

GJEP and Biofuelwatch disrupt industry event with Richard Branson

For Immediate Release                            21 June 2012

Activists Disrupt Sir Richard Branson at Avoided Deforestation Rio +20 Event

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil–Activists from Global Justice Ecology Project and Biofuelwatch disrupted Sir Branson’s speech with chants and placards at the Rio+20 Earth Summit event titled “Advancing Public-Private Partnerships for Deforestation-Free / Sustainable Agriculture” today at the Windsor Barra hotel in Rio.

“We came here to interfere with this event because we recognize that the negotiations inside the UN’s official Rio+20 Conference are essentially irrelevant”, stated Anne Petermann, Executive Director of Global Justice Ecology Project. “The real negotiations that will determine the fate of the planet are being held outside of the UN space at these industry-sponsored events”, she added.

Ambassador Donald Steinberg, Deputy Administrator of USAID was clear on this point when he stated during his presentation at the event, “these [public-private partnership] events are not side events, these are the main events”.

“Biofuelwatch took part in this action because of Richard Branson’s key role in promoting large-scale biofuels for aviation, geo-engineering and other destructive techno fixes”, stated Almuth Ernsting. “Branson is responsible for vast carbon emissions from his airline to which he now wants to add space tourism – his ‘solutions’ include more destructive monoculture plantations which harm forests, peoples and climate”.

Parallel to the negotiations that have been going on around Rio+20, the UN Climate Conferences and other UN forums, industry is coming together with countries like Norway to create ways to implement highly controversial market-based approaches like REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) that cannot be passed in the multilateral meetings.

Participants in the event included executives from Coca Cola and Unilever, both of which are implicated in serious human rights abuses and environmental destruction.

“We took this action in solidarity with Indigenous Peoples, local communities and small farmers whose livelihoods are threatened by the privatization of their lands for Green Economy-style projects”, stated Keith Brunner of Gears of Change and Global Justice Ecology Project. “Public-private partnerships, such as those discussed here, are driving a vast transfer of wealth, resources and land into private hands–from the 99% to the 1%”.

After the disruption, participants in the action left the premises.

Contact: Anne Petermann, Global Justice Ecology Project +55.21.8079.0538

Email: anne@globaljusticeecology.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Rio march pics, via Patrick Bond

Wednesday 20 June was a critical day to protest the Green Economy orientation of the United Nations Environment Program, the Rio+20 farce and the Brazilian government’s hostility to nature and people.


It wasn’t an easy day because by mistake, someone ordered clouds, occasional showers and a steady drizzle to dampen the mood…

… but around 50,000 turned out anyhow…

… and some found ways to stay dry…

… even the World Wide Fund for Nature’s leadership came…

… o

ne of the most hated targets, was Brazilian President Dilma and her chainsaw…

… and there were clear messages

everywhere…

… such as, we need financing of food not bombs (those are pita bread decorations on that tank)…

… and other guerrilla theatre…

… and most strikingly, a gigantic flag filled a half-city block, and people danced

… the women’s contingents were impressive…

… along with a few others from Africa…

… students were strong…

… recyclers…

… trade unions, including academics on strike (greve)…

… and in greatest numbers, bringing up the rear were the red-flag-waving Movement of Landless Workers…

… at last, the end, at the Rio Municipal Theatre, one of the city’s most opulent buildings…

… overall, comparing to Joburg anti-W$$D (World Summit on Sustainable Development) in 2002, this march was bigger, more boisterous, more creative, a bit less focused, but certainly sending the signal that there is a huge anti-corporate activist contingent available to turn back that toxic tide of neoliberalized nature that the United Nations and its multinational corporate allies are pushing on the world. This amazing spirit needs to spread… everywhere, urgently.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reclaim the UN from corporate capture — Friends of the Earth International

As the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) turns 20, there are real concerns about the increasing influence of major corporations and business lobby groups within the UN. Download full report: Reclaim the UN from corporate capture — … Continue reading

Gallery | Leave a comment